 |
 |
The first ever named complaint in this case came on May 7 ,2006 when Nandlal (father of Payal), accused Moninder of having hidden his daughter but police did not act on this complaint for seven months and in htese seven months 8-10 more children went missing.In fact Nandlal had to take the help of the court just to get his F.I.R registered. He was virtually thrown away from the SSP\'s house when he went there a third time begging for help. These are facts which finally came to light. But what did not come out was that this SSP was R.K.S.Rathore and not Piyush Mordia. Piyush Mordia had been transferred from Noida on April 26, 2006 whereas Payal disappeared on May 7, 2006. Is it fair to hold an offficer (who was transferred to another district)responsible for the misdeeds of his successor? |
| |
 |
|
|
Was there an unspoken understanding between RKS Rathore, Dinesh Yadav and B.P.Singh because of which Rathore never recommended action against any one of them.? Did B.P.Singh not write the missing reports because of the instructions of his seniors? Was it due to the instructions from his SSP that Dinesh Yadav did not register Payal\'s case for a long time and filed an affidavit in favour of Moninder singh Pandher & Surinder Koli and let them off inspite of a named report against them? |
| |
|
|
|
The subordinate officers during whose tenure lapses took place and who were finally held responsible by the court as well - namely Dinesh Yadav (Deputy SP), B. P. Singh Yadav (Station officer) and Simaranjeet Kaur (sub inspector) - all of them got posted to Noida only after Piyush Mordia\'s transfer- none of them has ever worked with Piyush Mordia in his entire career. They were never supervised by him. How could he be held responsible for their lapses or actions? Was he made a scapegoat? |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
